Page 19 Effect of telehealth on quality of life and psychological out comes over 12 months
P. 19
BMJ 2013;346:f653 doi: 10.1136/bmj.f653 (Published 26 February 2013) Page 19 of 20
RESEARCH
Fig 6 Standardised adjusted effect sizes for intention to treat analysis, complete case cohort. Effect sizes (mean differences)
were calculated at short term and long term, on the basis of EMMs. Web table 3 shows numbers for each arm at each
assessment point. Unstandardised mean differences represent the estimated (adjusted) magnitude of difference between
arms in the original scale metric. Standardised mean differences allow for direct comparisons across different outcomes.
These standardardised mean differences were calculated with a correction for sample size (Hedge’s g), and are interpreted
in the same way as Cohen’s d
Fig 7 Standardised adjusted effect sizes for intention to treat analysis, available case cohort. Web table 3 shows numbers
for each arm at each assessment point
No commercial reuse: See rights and reprints http://www.bmj.com/permissions Subscribe: http://www.bmj.com/subscribe
RESEARCH
Fig 6 Standardised adjusted effect sizes for intention to treat analysis, complete case cohort. Effect sizes (mean differences)
were calculated at short term and long term, on the basis of EMMs. Web table 3 shows numbers for each arm at each
assessment point. Unstandardised mean differences represent the estimated (adjusted) magnitude of difference between
arms in the original scale metric. Standardised mean differences allow for direct comparisons across different outcomes.
These standardardised mean differences were calculated with a correction for sample size (Hedge’s g), and are interpreted
in the same way as Cohen’s d
Fig 7 Standardised adjusted effect sizes for intention to treat analysis, available case cohort. Web table 3 shows numbers
for each arm at each assessment point
No commercial reuse: See rights and reprints http://www.bmj.com/permissions Subscribe: http://www.bmj.com/subscribe
